System Failure: Why Victims Are Still Unsafe in 2025 and What Must Change Now
For decades, victims of domestic abuse, coercive control, stalking and child abuse have been told that the UK’s safeguarding systems are improving. Government promises appear every year; new policies, new reviews, new strategies.
Yet in 2025, victims continue to die, children continue to be placed in danger, and perpetrators continue to exploit the very systems designed to stop them.
The truth is devastating:
It is not that the system is broken.
It is that the system was never built to protect victims in the first place.
This is why survivors still cannot rely on police, social services or the family courts, and why 1VAA continues to expose these failures and demand change.
Police Failures: “No Further Action” as a Default Response
The police remain the first point of failure for the vast majority of domestic abuse and stalking victims.
Recent data shows:
- Police recorded 1.4 million domestic abuse-related incidents in the year ending March 2024 (ONS).
- Yet only 6% resulted in a charge or summons (CPS).
- Over 700,000 stalking offences were reported but fewer than 2% led to meaningful action.
- Nearly half of all victims who contact police receive a “no further action” outcome.
The most common reasons given are:
- “Insufficient evidence”
- “Personal dispute”
- “No realistic prospect of conviction”
- “Counter-allegations”
- “It’s not in the public interest”
But survivors repeatedly tell us a different story:
“The officer didn’t even take a full statement.”
“They told me there was nothing they could do.”
“He’s respectable, he wouldn’t do that.”
“Someone like him wouldn’t be an abuser.”
“I wasn’t believed.”
Every time police dismiss a victim, the risk increases.
Every time a perpetrator faces no consequences, they escalate.
Some victims do not survive that escalation.
Stalking: Ignored Until It Becomes Murder
Stalking is one of the strongest predictors of homicide.
The “8-Stage Homicide Timeline” proves that stalkers often follow the same escalating pattern — predictable, measurable, and preventable.
Yet:
- Police routinely categorise stalking as “relationship issues”
- Risk assessments are incorrectly completed or never done
- Victims are told to block the perpetrator, rather than receiving protection
- Important digital evidence is not examined
- Officers fail to recognise obsessive pursuit as a risk indicator
Over 1.4 million women and 700,000 men experience stalking every year (ONS), yet stalking remains one of the least understood crimes in policing.
Every homicide review tells the same story:
“The signs were there. The victim asked for help. The system failed.”
Family Courts: When Protection Becomes Punishment
Family courts are now one of the most dangerous places for victims of domestic abuse and coercive control.
Cafcass and multiple academic reviews show:
- Children’s disclosures of abuse are frequently minimised or labelled “coached”
- Parents reporting abuse are accused of “alienation”
- Abusive parents are granted contact in over 80% of cases
- Courts rarely order fact-finding hearings even when evidence is strong
- Coercive control is misunderstood or ignored
- Protective parents are punished for safeguarding their children
The result?
Children are handed to abusers.
Protective parents are labelled hostile.
Trauma is dismissed as “conflict.”
And perpetrators weaponise the court process itself:
- endless applications
- cross-allegations
- litigation abuse
- threats of court to maintain control
The court becomes the abuser’s greatest weapon.
Social Services: Inconsistent, Untrained, and Often Dangerous
Across the UK, social services departments are overstretched, undertrained, and overwhelmed.
Many social workers:
- have little or no training in coercive control
- misunderstand trauma responses
- are easily manipulated by perpetrators
- misinterpret distress as instability
- confuse fear with hostility
- treat disclosures as “conflict”
- rely on inaccurate assessments
- place children in unsafe contact arrangements
And the result is catastrophic.
Children are removed from protective parents.
Victims are blamed for reporting abuse.
Danger is labelled “potential future harm.”
Perpetrators exploit every gap in professional knowledge.
This is why 1VAA demands mandatory training, accountability, and oversight.
Evidence Ignored: Why Victims Lose Cases They Should Win
The UK has a shocking problem:
Evidence is treated as optional.
Across thousands of cases, we see:
- key evidence omitted from reports
- police logs missing or not requested
- stalking patterns not analysed
- digital footprints ignored
- disclosures not recorded
- risk assessments incorrectly completed
- findings overridden without explanation
- “professional opinion” used instead of fact
Victims often ask:
“How can I lose a case when I have the evidence?”
Because the system is not built on evidence.
It is built on assumptions, rushing, pressure, bias, and outdated training.
1VAA fights this by building:
- full chronologies
- incident logs
- pattern analysis
- safeguarding reports
- bundle-ready evidence packs
- police escalation documents
- professional challenges
Where others say “nothing can be done”, we do the work that agencies won’t.
Accountability: The Missing Piece
Every major domestic abuse murder review says the same thing:
- “Lessons were not learned.”
- “Training was insufficient.”
- “Risk was underestimated.”
- “Opportunities were missed.”
- “The victim wasn’t believed.”
And every year, the same failures repeat.
Why?
Because there is no national accountability framework for:
- police decisions
- social care assessments
- family court safeguarding
- handling of evidence
- failures to investigate
- officer misconduct
- dangerous recommendations
This is why 1VAA developed real solutions:
- JLE – Justice & Legislation Executive
- JVCM – Justice (Victim & Crime) Management Regulation
These are comprehensive, actionable, and built from real evidence.
Not theories.
Not wishes.
Solutions.
“If the system won’t protect us, we will protect each other.”
1VAA was created for one reason:
To protect victims where the system fails.
We:
- intervene
- investigate
- escalate
- challenge
- support
- advocate
- expose
- reform
We stand between the victim and a system that wasn’t built for them.
And we will not stop.










penatibus et magnis dis
What is it?